George Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language” Rhetorical Précis Essay

Goerge Orwell, in Politics and the English Language, demonstrates how to effectively express wholenessself with written language. To do so, Orwell states the dos and donts of effective create verbally. Because the rules for writing effectively are so complex, Orwell utilizes parallel structure to make the consistency structure of his es word more cohesive it has nothing to do with archaicism it is especially come to with the scrapping of It has nothing to do with correct grammar it is not concerned with Nor does it even imply though it does imply (Orwell). Orwell interlaces multiple parallel structures to tip over the body both unity and a back-and-forth feel that keeps the audience on their toes. If he had not done so, his arguments would have quickly become repetitious and monotonous.Although Orwell specifically states that correct grammar and syntax are of no importance, one can see that he has gone to great lengths to achieve an attractive effect through syntax. The bac k-and-forth action of the body paragraphs and his self-contradiction alludes to a rule he introduces later in the writing Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous (Orwell). He then goes on to break a number of his previously stated rules, some more blatantly than others place some worn-out and useless phrase into the dustbin (Orwell). He excessively uses polysyllabic diction at some points, though he expressly states to Never use a long word where a scam one will do. His contradiction of himself may at root leave some readers puzzled, but ultimately establishes the concept that a writer should not be afraid to break conventions to make a point.