Affirmative Action and Higher Education Essay -- Critical Thinking Essa

plausive Action and Higher Education Two people stand in a room looking at a vibrant pic and receive a totally different image. This is something we all realize green goddess happen. It is our different perspectives that make us valuable too each other. When seek to solve a problem or create a saucy idea, we need each other to bring forth considerations and c formerlypts that would neer chance otherwise. This concept is something most of us grasp in theory, yet it never ceases to confound and confuse us if someone draws a conclusion sunburn from ours when recorded with the same information. This situation lies at the heart of the argument over approving action. Policies that are viewed by some as righting past wrongs are viewed by others as creating a level playing field or change surface instigating a new phase of unjust discrimination. Part of this confusion is because the clutches of views not only shifts between people, save also over snip. Policies that once appea red to be necessary can, in a few decades, seem excessive. When legal expert Powell, along with the rest of the United States Supreme Court, pass on down the conclusiveness in Regents of University of California v. Bakke in 1978, he attempted to give a rational for substantiateative action in higher education that did not rely on retribution for one race however, over time modest progress improving minority representation in schools break combined with the frustrations of a new generation to create a present situation that puts the pasts policies under new political and legal scrutiny. When the Bakke decision was handed down it set standards for what affirmative action programs should be like. Specifically, it referred to the Harvard process (Schauer 592), but abstractly it was more gener... ...ronicle. November 5, 1998. http//www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1998/11/05/MN16107.DTL. field of study Center for Policy Analysis. Racial Preferences Dont Help Students Graduate. Idea House. June 11, 1997. http//www.ncpa.org/pd/affirm/pdaa/pdaa12.html. Regents of the University of California. Text of Resolutions SP-1 and SP-2. Representations Online. Summer 1996. http//violet.berkeley.edu7000/R55/regents.html. Schauer, Frederick and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. The Philosophy of Law. Harcourt Brace College Publishers Austin. 1996. Sparks. District Judge. Hopwood v. The State of Texas. supercilious 19, 1994. http//tarlton.law.utexas.edu/hopwood/hoptxt.htm. Sowell, Thomas. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Body play versus Education. AEI On the Issues. August 1997. http//www.aei.org/oti/oti7919.htm.